WE’RE STILL CLEANING UP THE MESSES, YEARS LATER, FROM HARPER’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL “TOUGH ON CRIME” AGENDA.

https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/practice-areas/criminal/mandatory-minimum-sentences-for-child-luring-unconstitutional-supreme-court-of-canada/381103?hsmemberId={{contact.hs_object_id}}&utm_source=GA&e=ZGpyZWV2ZUBiZWxsbmV0LmNh&utm_medium=20231107&utm_campaign=LTW-Newsletter-20231107&utm_content=60340243-7A36-40AE-831C-5923AFD1310D&tu=60340243-7A36-40AE-831C-5923AFD1310D

MORE COWBELL! – What do the courts do when they can’t handle the number of trials they already set? Well, set more trials, of course.

Ontario’s Court of Justice is issuing new practice directives in a bid to reduce delay and “unnecessary administrative appearances” in criminal proceedings.

The three new rules, which take hold Nov. 1, will involve the setting of trial dates in accordance with Jordan principles, the timely handling of s. 11 Charter applications and the enforcement of set adjournments for case management.

According to an announcement from the court, the first “commits the Court to offering a criminal trial date that complies with the obligations set out in R. v. Jordan to ensure an accused person’s constitutional right to a trial within a reasonable time is respected.”

The court, it states, will offer parties a trial date “that is expected to result in the case being completed within 15 months of the Information sworn date.”

Parties will have been expected to have completed all intake steps involved with case management and be ready to either resolve the case or schedule a trial or preliminary hearing within six months of the information sworn date.

The Jordan rules come from the landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, which sets time limits on criminal court proceedings in a bid to address unwarranted and unconstitutional delay. 

The second directive sees to it that the determination of s. 11 Charter applications is done in a timely way. Under this new rule, the hearing of an application must take place “at least four months before trial so that, if the application is granted and a stay of proceedings is imposed, the scheduled trial dates may be utilized for other matters.”

Among other things, s. 11 deals with the right to a timely trial and the protection of unreasonable delay in criminal matters.

The third, which applies only to courts in Toronto and Brampton, “establishes a standard 12-week adjournment for matters in which counsel is retained at an accused person’s first or second appearance in case management court.”

By the end of this adjournment period, both the defence and Crown should have finished the case management steps and be either ready to resolve the case or set a date for trial or preliminary inquiry.

“Reducing administrative appearances for counsel matters will shorten case management court dockets and permit the Court to spend more time addressing those matters which require more active case management,” states the announcement.  

Additional details on the new directives can be found in the announcement.  

If you have any information, story ideas or news tips for Law360 Canada, please contact Terry Davidson at t.davidson@lexisnexis.ca or 905-415-5899.

https://www.law360.ca/articles/52017/ontario-court-issues-new-directives-to-reduce-delay-in-criminal-proceedings

IRONICALLY THE LEGALIZATION OF CANNABIS HAS LED TO MORE INTRUSIVE SEARCH POWERS BY POLICE – “In Ontario, the transportation of marijuana is governed by the Cannabis Control Act, which allows the police, in the absence of any suspected criminal activity, to search any vehicle and all its occupants (if they believe that “any cannabis is contained in the vehicle” and it is “readily available to any person in the vehicle.”) It can’t be understated just how broad the new police search powers are – we are talking about searching anywhere in the vehicle, including the trunk, and all passengers and their belongings, down to the deep pockets, makeup bags, and yes, even bras. So, here’s the big question: if the purpose of the Cannabis Control Act is to make sure drivers don’t have access to cannabis while driving, what’s the deal with searching the vehicle’s trunk? It doesn’t quite add up.” And it gets worse …

https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/news/opinion/legalized-cannabis-still-has-a-problem-broader-search-and-seizure-police-powers/380698?hsmemberId={{contact.hs_object_id}}&utm_source=GA&e=ZGpyZWV2ZUBiZWxsbmV0LmNh&utm_medium=20231031&utm_campaign=LTW-Newsletter-20231031&utm_content=60340243-7A36-40AE-831C-5923AFD1310D&tu=60340243-7A36-40AE-831C-5923AFD1310D

THE MANDELA EFFECT –  Our memories may be a “factually incorrect recollection. They could strongly believe in something, or strongly believe that they’ve had this experience or this memory, but in actual fact, it’s fantasy,” 

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/18/world/mandela-effect-collective-false-memory-scn?utm_term=16954775615318ceb8287b688&utm_source=cnn_Wonder+Theory+9.23.23&utm_medium=email&bt_ee=Mtah9GOPd1HRbRfWJJdXGCn7jBbufegCh2VKxCDekF%2FVj%2F2CxzJmAFathyAPL5C1&bt_ts=1695477561534

THE MILTON COURTHOUSE UPDATE: Is it healthy and safe? Not so sure.

https://www.lawtimesnews.com/practice-areas/criminal/judges-resume-hearings-at-milton-courthouse-after-voicing-concerns-about-mould-and-asbestos/379825?hsmemberId={{contact.hs_object_id}}&utm_source=GA&e=ZGpyZWV2ZUBiZWxsbmV0LmNh&utm_medium=20230921&utm_campaign=LTW-Newsletter-20230921&utm_content=60340243-7A36-40AE-831C-5923AFD1310D&tu=60340243-7A36-40AE-831C-5923AFD1310D