Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

THE RANSBERGER PIVOT – A basic persuasive technique that begins with STFU.

Posted byDennis Reeve 5 November 20215 November 2021
https://abovethelaw.com/2021/11/what-is-the-ransberger-pivot/?utm_campaign=Above%20the%20Law%20Small%20Law&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=179263426&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_Qd5kDOCYN97_V7uG2iyHqmcW4TYMyMDe-cDmICvUGz7JaNTTMZ4-hGrkLYSJWaO5xks4SklCQVuhMSztOqxQkQ8PXnA&utm_content=179263426&utm_source=hs_email
Posted byDennis Reeve5 November 20215 November 2021Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
DUTY COUNSEL –> UNDERRATED, OVERWORKED AND UNDERPAID – “Fortunately, in Canada, people who need legal advice can turn to one of the most important and least-known essential services we have: duty counsel. It’s just another thing to be proud of in our country. Duty counsel represent people who don’t have a lawyer in the initial stages of the justice system: first appearances before a judge, bail hearings, child custody matters, mental health courts and much more.”
Next post Next post:
A JUDGE HAS DETERMINED THAT DELIBERATELY COUGHING ON SOMEONE CAN CONSTITUTE THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE OF ASSAULT

Recent Posts

  • Credit also has to be given to JAMES LOCKYER for his tireless advocacy over many years to bring this to fruition.
  • Lawyers in England are refusing to represent some people because their legal aid system is insufficient to maintain a viable practice. The legal aid system in Ontario is similarly perpetually on the brink.
  • Since 1982 accused persons have had the right to a trial within a reasonable time. We’ve had the Askov, Morin and now the Jordan cases of the Supreme Court of Canada trying to ensure that right, with only limited success. So now the courts are stacking cases on top of other cases on their daily trial lists that have no possibility of being reached for trial on that date.
  • JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED – Every person charged with a criminal offence has the constitutional right to have their trial held within a reasonable time. Our Supreme Court has twice attempted to define what is reasonable through the cases of Askov and Jordan. The result has been decades of hundreds of cases being “stayed” from proceeding due to delay and further delays caused by the complex application procedures required to assert that right. Nothing has changed. Simply demanding that the trial process proceed expeditiously doesn’t work.
  • WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR BAIL SYSTEM? – The federal government enacts the criminal code. The province applies it. The province builds and owns the courts. The province hires the Judges, the Justices of the Peace, the Crown Attorneys and court staff.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.