Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.

Posted byDennis Reeve 29 August 2025

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/pirros-office-tries-fails-persuade-grand-jury-indict-sandwich-guy-dc-rcna227848?cid=eml_maddow_20250829&user_email=5a0dc31f0d134607b25864cad5688b81b4ea2b406c141c6497b36d8c64c49b3d

Posted byDennis Reeve29 August 2025Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
HELP ME OUT HERE. Does it make sense to allow a stranger to eTransfer themselves money from your bank account in exchange for cash? I don’t get it. According to The Star:
Next post Next post:
THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD

Recent Posts

  • Sexual history has always been capable of being relevant in a sexual offence trial as long as it’s not tendered for the purpose of promoting the twin myths that the complainant is more likely to have consented to the sexual activity or is less worthy of being believed.
  • Do we need more police officers? According to City News, that’s what Torontonians want. What does that mean?
  • DO HARSH CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT INPROVE PUBLIC SAFETY?
  • IT’S VERY SIMPLE
  • Who do we turn to when the police are the corrupt criminals?
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.