Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

GOOGLE-HAPPY JURORS ARE A NO NO.

Posted bywpengine 23 May 2018

Jurors in three recent cases were discovered conducting their own online research, despite strict instructions from judges to consider only the evidence raised in court.

Source: How Google-happy jurors are derailing Ontario trials | The Star

Posted bywpengine23 May 2018Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
UNINTENDED IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF INCREASING THE MAXIMUM SENTENCE FOR IMPAIRED DRIVING TO 10 YEARS.
Next post Next post:
Fentanyl production, worldwide distribution, money laundering, global real estate investment by Chinese gangs explained in a 1:45 min. video.

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.