Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

A SIMPLE RULE: DON’T VIDEOS OF SEXUAL ACTIVITY because “In 2015, Parliament amended Sect. 162 of the Criminal Code, making it an offence to record or distribute images or video of an intimate act without consent of every person who appears in the video.”

Posted byDennis Reeve 15 March 202415 March 2024

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london/sharing-sexual-images-without-consent-illegal-in-canada-since-2015-recent-case-shows-it-s-still-a-problem-1.7141379

Posted byDennis Reeve15 March 202415 March 2024Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
OH NO! While we’re still, years later, cleaning up the messes of Harper’s unconstitutional mandatory minimum sentences (MMS) and the delays that resulted in Judicial stays of serious criminal cases, Poilievre wants to take us down that same unconstitutional road with his rebranded mandatory minimum penalties (MMP).
Next post Next post:
WHEN JUSTICE DAVID H. DOHERTY SPEAKS THE LEGAL PROFESSION LISTENS. When Justice David H. Doherty speaks about the integrity of Judicial appointments, Premier Doug Ford should listen. “It does a disservice to suggest that the qualification for appointment to the judiciary should include some manifestation of allegiance to, or even sympathy with, the agenda of those who are fixed with the responsibility of appointing judges,” 

Recent Posts

  • THE POLITICS OF FEAR – crime is rampant and you should be afraid but we’ll fix it by being “tough on crime”. Now you’re safe. You’re welcome.
  • OUR COURTS ARE THE LAST BASTION OF DEFENCE BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS AND POLICE MISCONDUCT.
  • My lawyer son gifted me this voluminous legal treatise on the Maritime Law of Liechtenstein. I have read it many times now and I think I’m grasping not only the basic concept but also some of the many nuances.
  • IS DECRIMINALIZATION OF DRINKING AND DRIVING OFFENCES A GOOD IDEA?
  • IT’S BEEN 10 YEARS SINCE THE S.C.C. GAVE COURTS 18 MONTHS AND 30 MONTHS, RESPECTIVELY, TO CONCLUDE CRIMINAL CASES. THAT IS NOT “QUICK” TO AN ACCUSED OR A VICTIM. WHY CAN’T THE GOVERNMENT COMPLY WITH THIS CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT?
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.