Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

JAIL SENTENCE CREDIT – A sentence of incarceration is to be reduced by crediting 1) 1.5 to 1 for every day of pre-trial custody (to compensate for the loss of statutory remission) and may be reduced by 2) an undetermined credit for onerous and harsh jail conditions (Duncan credit) and 3) an undetermined credit for restrictive judicial release conditions (Downes credit). Of the remaining balance, statutory remission is granted after 2/3 is served.

Posted byDennis Reeve 8 August 20228 August 2022
https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/practice-areas/criminal/ontario-court-of-appeal-reduces-marijuana-producers-sentence-for-onerous-incarceration-conditions/368789?utm_source=GA&e=ZGpyZWV2ZUBiZWxsbmV0LmNh&utm_medium=20220808&utm_campaign=CLW-Newsletter-20220808&utm_content=60340243-7A36-40AE-831C-5923AFD1310D&tu=60340243-7A36-40AE-831C-5923AFD1310D
Posted byDennis Reeve8 August 20228 August 2022Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
DAVID AND GOLIATH AND LEGAL AID – Covid has tipped the balance even further and not in a good way.
Next post Next post:
MAR-A-LAGO RAID? Let’s be clear that the search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence was not a “raid”. It was a judicially authorized search issued upon sworn evidence of reasonable grounds to believe that an offence was committed, that there is likely to be evidence of the crime located at that place, and that other investigative techniques have not been successful.

Recent Posts

  • THE POLITICS OF FEAR – crime is rampant and you should be afraid but we’ll fix it by being “tough on crime”. Now you’re safe. You’re welcome.
  • OUR COURTS ARE THE LAST BASTION OF DEFENCE BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS AND POLICE MISCONDUCT.
  • My lawyer son gifted me this voluminous legal treatise on the Maritime Law of Liechtenstein. I have read it many times now and I think I’m grasping not only the basic concept but also some of the many nuances.
  • IS DECRIMINALIZATION OF DRINKING AND DRIVING OFFENCES A GOOD IDEA?
  • IT’S BEEN 10 YEARS SINCE THE S.C.C. GAVE COURTS 18 MONTHS AND 30 MONTHS, RESPECTIVELY, TO CONCLUDE CRIMINAL CASES. THAT IS NOT “QUICK” TO AN ACCUSED OR A VICTIM. WHY CAN’T THE GOVERNMENT COMPLY WITH THIS CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT?
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.