Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

Simply put, mischief is defined by section 430(1) of the Criminal Code.

Posted byDennis Reeve 21 February 202221 February 2022

430 (1) Every one commits mischief who wilfully
(a) destroys or damages property;
(b) renders property dangerous, useless, inoperative or ineffective;
(c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property; or
(d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with any person in the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property.

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-430.html

Posted byDennis Reeve21 February 202221 February 2022Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
ANOTHER ASSISTANT CROWN ATTORNEY APPOINTED A JUDGE – I do not question the quality of this appointment. My concern is that government employment does not become the sole pathway to a judicial appointment.
Next post Next post:
A PUBLIC SERVICE MESSAGE – For anyone who was at the “Ottawa Protest” I recommend that you lawyerup with a criminal defence lawyer. For anyone who was there with a truck, just because you left doesn’t mean that the police won’t confiscate your rig, possibly when they come to serve you with criminal charges. For anyone who had kids there you may want to speak with a family law lawyer to get advice on what to do if the Children’s Aid Society calls.

Recent Posts

  • THE POLITICS OF FEAR – crime is rampant and you should be afraid but we’ll fix it by being “tough on crime”. Now you’re safe. You’re welcome.
  • OUR COURTS ARE THE LAST BASTION OF DEFENCE BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS AND POLICE MISCONDUCT.
  • My lawyer son gifted me this voluminous legal treatise on the Maritime Law of Liechtenstein. I have read it many times now and I think I’m grasping not only the basic concept but also some of the many nuances.
  • IS DECRIMINALIZATION OF DRINKING AND DRIVING OFFENCES A GOOD IDEA?
  • IT’S BEEN 10 YEARS SINCE THE S.C.C. GAVE COURTS 18 MONTHS AND 30 MONTHS, RESPECTIVELY, TO CONCLUDE CRIMINAL CASES. THAT IS NOT “QUICK” TO AN ACCUSED OR A VICTIM. WHY CAN’T THE GOVERNMENT COMPLY WITH THIS CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT?
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.