CAN YOU SHOOT SOMEONE WHO IS ON YOUR PROPERTY? – The law says no but the jury had a different view. Add to that the exclusion of indigenous people from the jury, this is bound to be a controversial decision. https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2018/02/10/outrage-follows-not-guilty-verdict-for-gerald-stanley-in-shooting-death-of-colten-boushie.html

Gerald Stanley never claimed such a right, but his trial resurrected a dangerous fallacy among residents that could cause future grief

MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCES CONTINUE TO BE STRUCK DOWN ACROSS THE COUNTRY – because they are rigid, unyielding and fail to take into account the particular circumstances of each case. The concept itself is “cruel and unusual”.

Dylan Scofield has an IQ of 59. He has pleaded guilty to sexual interference involving two 15-year-old girls.

Source: Mandatory prison for mentally disabled sex offender ‘cruel and unusual,’ B.C. judge says – British Columbia – CBC News

JURY SELECTION – It can be a rather peculiar process. For one, we have peremptory challenges because we’re not allowed to know anything about the prospective jurors except their name and occupation and their appearance.

The trial in the death of Saskatchewan First Nations man Colten Boushie is exposing a fundamental flaw in Canada’s justice system, say some legal experts: the ability to reject jurors without specifying a reason.

Source: Stanley trial exposes problems with jury selection, say legal experts – Saskatoon – CBC News

COP CORRUPTION IN BALTIMORE – So the Baltimore Police Gun Trace Task Force kept imitation guns in their police vehicles in the event that they “inadvertently” shot an unarmed person, they could plant the gun and claim self-defence. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Shocked?

The weapons were kept in patrol cars “in case we accidentally hit somebody,” the former detective testified in court.

Source: Ex-Cop Says Baltimore Police Carried BB Guns To Hide Dirty Shootings