BENEFIT OF LESSER PUNISHMENT – The Charter provides that “any person charged with an offence has the right if found guilty of the offence and if the punishment for the offence has been varied between the time of commission and the time of sentencing, to the benefit of the lesser punishment.” What if the punishment was lower between those two points in time. Does one get the benefit of the LOWEST punishment prescribed over that period of time? The S.C.C. says: “A binary right involves a comparison of the punishments under the laws in force at two set points in time (commission of the offence and sentencing) and the right to receive the lesser of these punishments. … 11 (i) is intended to confer a binary right.” In other words, NO. It is not a “global right”.

Majority of court finds that s. 11(1) of Charter confers binary, not global right

Source: Convicted person has right to lesser of two punishments existing at time of commission or sentencing

A LIMIT ON POLICE POWERS – The police have no authority to arrest an individual who is acting lawfully in order to prevent an apprehended breach of the peace. This is of particular importance in the context of public demonstrations. No more “kettling” or mass arrests at lawful protests.

The Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Fleming v Ontario, on October 4, 2019. The decision was unanimous, with Côté J. writing for the Court. The case is about common law police powers of arrest. In arresting Mr. Fleming (the Appellant), the Respondent Attorney-General of Ontario and police officers argued that they had made use of an ancillary common law police power authorizing the arrest of an individual who was acting lawfully in order to prevent an apprehended breach of the peace.

Source: The Supreme Court of Canada Holds that the Common Law Does Not Empower the Police to Arrest a Person Who is Acting Lawfully

Alberta to introduce legislation that would allow access to partner’s criminal records. OR you could ask your partner to provide a criminal record check.

Legislation is being introduced this fall to bring a “Clare’s Law” to Alberta that would allow people access to criminal records of their partners in hopes it will help protect people from potential domestic violence.

Source: Alberta to introduce legislation that would allow access to partner’s criminal records

DRUG IMPAIRMENT – THE FACT IS THAT IT CANNOT BE DETERMINED BY THE ALCOHOL MODEL APPROACH WE ARE TAKING – For cannabis, an officer spends six hours processing an impaired driver, compared to one hour for a driver impaired by alcohol. This difference reflects the time required to complete a specialized field sobriety test, to administer a test by a drug recognition expert and take a blood sample. The minimum cost to have one officer deal with a cannabis-impaired driver is $536.88, compared to $89.48 for an alcohol-impaired driver, suggests the report. Those costs don’t include labour for paperwork or court appearances.

Police say supply shortages skew the real impact on community and costs

Source: Suspected cannabis-impaired drivers more costly to test: Police report