The ReeveLaw Blog

Jail, jail and more jail is Prime Minister Harper’s manic response to problems that don’t exist.  Thank goodness we have the Supreme Court to protect us from the onslaught of this man’s draconian laws. “The ruling said the mandatory minimum sentence could ensnare people with “little or no moral fault” and who pose “little or no danger to the public.”

Gun crime law struck down – Canada News – Castanet.net.

Many Ontario Court of Justice Judges are opposed to the Victim Surcharge Harper recently made mandatory because it is a fine levied upon every criminal conviction without regard to the person’s ability to pay. It is a disproportionate punishment upon the poor. A Superior Court Judge has now ruled that it’s okay because it’s not a punishment, just a consequence of conviction. That’s not the end of it though. We have other lines of argument and the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada to go before this thing is finally decided.

Victim surcharge constitutional, appeal judge rules.

PERSONALITY MATTERS TO CLIENTS – Particularly in the criminal law field, clients come to us under a great deal of stress.  They’re in our office because they have to be, not because they want to be. A client is risking a great deal in his/her choice of lawyer to represent them. They are investing a great deal of trust in the personality they choose to do so.  We understand that.

Yes, Your Personality Matters to Clients.

A leader’s attitude trickles down to the rank and file. When we have one very senior Toronto Police Service officer arrogantly and defiantly thundering that when he detains a law abiding person, he is the authority and “he doesn’t need to give a reason for his detention of a citizen” this disrespectful, bullying attitude is sure to be adopted by all officers on patrol. This is why Ontario’s plan to circumvent your Constitutional rights by further empowering police to impose “administrative penalties” without court or judicial oversight is a very bad idea.

“In essence, officers go on a fishing expedition, ask seemingly innocuous questions of citizens, record the information in a database, keep it indefinitely, use it in future investigations, and allow it to sometimes show up in police checks requested by employers.” The police attitude: “One very senior officer reportedly thundered that he is the authority; he doesn’t need to give a reason for his detention of a citizen.” LEGALLY WRONG! YOU DO NOT HAVE TO ANSWER THEIR QUESTIONS.

Scurrilous ‘carding’ policy will lead to years of distrust: James | Toronto Star.

Not only did this police officer murder a “nice, good, honest, hard working person” but then he lied about what happened. This is why ideas like “administrative penalties” and “immediate roadside prohibitions” are a bad idea – because it makes cops the sole investigator, detainer, fact finder, judge, jury and instant executioner. How true in this case. Remember, this murder began as nothing more than a traffic stop for a broken tail light.

Everything The Police Said About Walter Scott’s Death Before A Video Showed What Really Happened | ThinkProgress.

British Columbia has a decriminalized option for impaired driving. Sounds like a good idea? Not really. Criminal Code sentences are imposed by the police officer at the roadside. Fail a roadside screening and instead of having it confirmed by a more accurate breathalyzer and being entitled to a trial the cop will impound your vehicle for 30 days, impose a $500 fine and prohibit you from driving for 90 days. To get your license back, after paying $680 to get your car back, you will have to pay $250 re-instatement fee, take a Responsible Driver Program ($996) and install an ignition interlock device ($1,700). No trial. The Officer is now investigator, detainer, fact finder, judge, jury and instant executioner.  Expect this to come to Ontario if the Supreme Court doesn’t strike this down.

B.C. moves to eliminate court trials for traffic violations.

Although the defence lawyer, the federal prosecutor and the Judge weren’t aware of it,  a finding of guilt or conviction for production of marijuana invokes a mandatory weapons prohibition order.

The Court » Blog Archive » A Prosecution “Littered With Errors”: Drugs and Guns in R v Shia.

In 2006 the Supreme Court of Canada decided that police or probation officers could not demand bodily samples from those on a peace bond, probation or a conditional sentence to ensure they were complying with conditions of abstention. They said that when a condition may pose a risk, such as the seizure of bodily samples it must be subject to stringent standards and safeguards and random drug testing at a probation officer’s discretion could become highly arbitrary. Stating that a positive test will be a breach of probation is contrary to criminal law. Yesterday all of that changed.

Legislation Comes Into Force to Ensure Offenders Comply With Court Orders Prohibiting Alcohol and Illicit Drug Use | Benzinga.

Everybody comes to a case with their own agenda. In this case the police came with dirty hands. Senior Toronto Police Service officers tried to induce Sandro Lisi to commit a criminal offence so they could arrest and charge him. Police are supposed to prevent crime not create it. How can you trust them now? Will there be consequences for this offensive action? I doubt it. There never are.

Undercover Cop Ordered To Lure Rob Ford’s Friend Alexander Lisi Into Drug Deal, Court Hears.