WHAT IS PROFESSIONALISM?

“Professional means ethical. It means upright. A profession is a calling, not just a job. When you are professional, you act with the highest standards of integrity and regard for your clients. It is professional to tell the truth, especially when it is hard to do so. People will remember the way you handle yourself years after they met you. What would you like them to remember you for?”

Being professional has always meant taking one’s obligations seriously, but at one time being professional was also assumed to mean being stiff and formal. A lot of people still have that idea in their minds.I have been called ‘unprofessional’ for a lot of silly reasons, like wearing a shade of pink lipstick that someone thought was too vivid, or for telling the truth when no one else in the room wanted the truth to be told.Gradually I realized that people throw the term ‘unprofessional’ around for several different reasons.There are behaviors, of course, that are actually unpr

Source: Seven Things That Brand You Unprofessional | Liz Ryan | LinkedIn

Zero-tolerance conundrum

ZERO TOLERANCE POLICIES – simply don’t work because they remove all judgment and discretion from the equation.They involve only the simple application of inflexible rules without consideration of the circumstances, the people involved or any humanity. Zero tolerance policies result in more injustice than it does justice.

The justice system has taken the idea of zero tolerance in domestic assault to such an extreme that it’s unfair to defendants and no longer works in the best interests of Ontario families, says a 40-year veteran of criminal law.

Source: Zero-tolerance conundrum

“WHAT EXACTLY WERE THE FEDS TOKING?”

“Not surprisingly, the high court kicked them to the curb, again. Medical marijuana is legal, the court reminded them in a unanimous decision, and that means there should be no difference between whether it’s ingested via a joint or baked in a brownie. Health Minister Rona Ambrose is outraged, of course.” The so-called HEALTH MINISTER, claims that marijuana is not a medicine. That’s what’s outrageous!! Even 3 year old Gwen knows better. “We can continue to treat our children without fear of prosecution. Yet the feds, so blinded by the smoke of their ideology, somehow think that’s a bad thing.”
http://www.straight.com/news/470286/lawyer-kirk-tousaw-calls-health-minister-rona-ambrose-utterly-ignorant-about-medical
https://www.straight.com/news/470036/stephen-harper-loses-again-supreme-court-canada-time-over-medical-marijuana

Well, there go more of our tax dollars up in smoke.

Source: Canada ends reefer madness for kids like Gwen | The London Free Press

DISTRACTED DRIVING – WHAT YOU CAN AND CAN’T DO

There’s a lot of hype about the increase in fines under Bill 31 and rumours going around that you can be charged for being distracted by drinking coffee, smoking, map reading, fiddling with the radio, arguing with your kids, putting on make-up, etc. but these things are not prohibited by the law. There has been no offence and there is no new offence of “distracted driving”. The governing section is 78.1 of the Highway Traffic Act which is entitled “Wireless Communications Device”. Here is the text:
78.1 (1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while holding or using a hand-held wireless communication device or other prescribed device that is capable of receiving or transmitting telephone communications, electronic data, mail or text messages.
Entertainment devices
(2) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while holding or using a hand-held electronic entertainment device or other prescribed device the primary use of which is unrelated to the safe operation of the motor vehicle.
Hands-free mode allowed
(3) Despite subsections (1) and (2), a person may drive a motor vehicle on a highway while using a device described in those subsections in hands-free mode.
(6) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply if all of the following conditions are met:
1. The motor vehicle is off the roadway or is lawfully parked on the roadway.
2. The motor vehicle is not in motion.
3. The motor vehicle is not impeding traffic.
Please note the limited scope and the exception and don’t believe the hype.

PLEADING GUILTY – WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

If you plead guilty to an offence you need to know and understand 3 things: 1. By pleading guilty you give up your right to a trial because you are ADMITTING the essential facts of the offence. YOU ARE ADMITTING GUILT. 2. Your plea must be voluntary – that is, it is YOUR choice. 3. When you plead guilty the decision of your sentence is up to the Judge and is not decided by your lawyer or the Crown Attorney. There are however steps your lawyer can take to ensure you do not get surprised by the sentence the Judge imposes.

Source: CanLII – 2015 ONCA 168 (CanLII)

PRACTISE vs. PRACTICE:

“And by “practise”, wish an “s” I mean the verb for getting up and repeatedly doing a thing until you get good at it – note the different spelling from “practice”, with a “c”, which is the verb for carrying out a profession. Lawyers love distinctions like this.” The Devils Advocate by Iain Morley Q.C.

HOBO COPS – A NEW TACTIC

HOBO COPS – Very tricksey! Cops pretending to be panhandlers, construction workers, even the Easter Bunny to catch you on your phone or texting. They also ride in buses and streetcars to be able to look into your car and notify other officers to pull you over. “Anti-poverty activists say it damages the already strangled reception of beggars from motorists and diminishes their daily take.”

Source: No escaping hobo cop: New tactic aims to catch drivers using cellphones on the road | National Post

SGT. MICHAEL FERRY IS A LIAR

Retired justice Lee Ferrier finds Sgt. Michael Ferry was “deliberately dishonest” under oath regarding arrest of Ryan Mitchell.

Lying under oath in a court trial is a criminal offence of PERJURY which demands a jail sentence because it strikes at the very core of the administration of justice – especially when it’s a police officer who is wilfully misleading the court. “Sgt. Ferry was found to have given incredible testimony under oath that can only have been deliberately dishonest. Other factors included Ferry’s previous disciplinary findings involving “serious dishonesty,” the fact that he was a supervisor whose illegal retaliatory conduct had occurred in full public view, and that he had failed to respect a citizen’s right to be left alone.” We defence lawyers will remember this officer’s name.

Source: Lying Toronto police officer gets two-month demotion for G20 choking | Toronto Star