Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

IT NEVER WAS A WAR ON DRUGS. IT WAS A WAR ON PEOPLE – specifically the poor, indigenous, and disadvantaged people.

Posted byDennis Reeve 14 July 202214 July 2022
https://www.thespec.com/opinion/editorials/2022/07/13/a-sensible-retreat-in-the-war-not-on-drugs-but-on-people.html
Posted byDennis Reeve14 July 202214 July 2022Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA EQUATES “FULL ANSWER AND DEFENCE” WITH COMPLAINANT PRIVACY ISSUES. “”Parliament has legislated a formula for wrongful convictions. Indeed, it has all but guaranteed them.” “The screening regime “makes private records presumptively inadmissible when tendered by the defence, but presumptively admissible when tendered by the Crown,” as the latter is not subject to the regime.” “This decision significantly and permanently erodes fair trial rights for people charged with certain offences. And that goes against our bedrock values – or what used to be our bedrock values.”
Next post Next post:
IF DURHAM REGIONAL POLICE HAVE SOME OF YOUR PROPERTY AS EVIDENCE, MAYBE THEY DON’T

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.