Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

Study Finds Dead Bodies Keep Moving – This information could be crucial to future death and homicide investigations.

Posted byDennis Reeve 21 April 202221 April 2022

https://thepremierdaily.com/dead-bodies-keep-moving-after-death-study/?BQvE=Wbm60I&fbclid=IwAR2rJzg3Cp7ccdJfPF2QAKh549MOagj4yUL7erawLI6YoE1jlZRl_AVCDKs

Posted byDennis Reeve21 April 202221 April 2022Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
POLICE OFFICERS SOMETIMES LIE IN COURT – If you have been charged with a criminal offence in York Region in which Police Constable Jordan NESBITT was involved, you better talk to a lawyer.
Next post Next post:
MISLEADING SENSATIONALISM – People will take what serves their purposes from a judgment. Like a catchy headline evoking an emotional response at the expense of understanding the logic of laws that protects us all from abuses of power. The headline, a “Charter technicality” flies in the face of the findings of Justice Prutschi. “Even without any malice or bad faith on the part of police, the breach was more than a mere technical error, he continued. “The result is the complete denial of true right to counsel. This is a serious violation favouring exclusion of evidence.”

Recent Posts

  • Credit also has to be given to JAMES LOCKYER for his tireless advocacy over many years to bring this to fruition.
  • Lawyers in England are refusing to represent some people because their legal aid system is insufficient to maintain a viable practice. The legal aid system in Ontario is similarly perpetually on the brink.
  • Since 1982 accused persons have had the right to a trial within a reasonable time. We’ve had the Askov, Morin and now the Jordan cases of the Supreme Court of Canada trying to ensure that right, with only limited success. So now the courts are stacking cases on top of other cases on their daily trial lists that have no possibility of being reached for trial on that date.
  • JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED – Every person charged with a criminal offence has the constitutional right to have their trial held within a reasonable time. Our Supreme Court has twice attempted to define what is reasonable through the cases of Askov and Jordan. The result has been decades of hundreds of cases being “stayed” from proceeding due to delay and further delays caused by the complex application procedures required to assert that right. Nothing has changed. Simply demanding that the trial process proceed expeditiously doesn’t work.
  • WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR BAIL SYSTEM? – The federal government enacts the criminal code. The province applies it. The province builds and owns the courts. The province hires the Judges, the Justices of the Peace, the Crown Attorneys and court staff.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.