Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

YORK REGIONAL POLICE’S PROJECT RAPHAEL IS NOT ENTRAPMENT, SAYS OUR COURT OF APPEAL

Posted byDennis Reeve 25 May 202125 May 2021

This ‘bait and switch” operation which began in 2014 is finally going to the Supreme Court of Canada to see if our court was correct or not.

Ontario Court of Appeal rejects entrapment argument in four cases arising from sting operation
https://www.lawtimesnews.com/practice-areas/litigation/ontario-court-of-appeal-rejects-entrapment-argument-in-four-cases-arising-from-sting-operation/356413?utm_source=GA&utm_medium=20210525&utm_campaign=LTW-Newsletter-20210525&utm_content=60340243-7A36-40AE-831C-5923AFD1310D&tu=60340243-7A36-40AE-831C-5923AFD1310D
Posted byDennis Reeve25 May 202125 May 2021Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
PROJECT ENDGAME ENDED – YRP were very proud of this bust … until they found out their cops stole $450,000 of property and planted evidence.
Next post Next post:
THE DISASTROUS IRONY OF THE 50-YEAR WAR ON DRUGS – The British experience.

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.