Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

PREDICTIVE POLICING – MINORITY REPORT? “The method uses a computer algorithm to predict where a crime will happen and who will commit it” – or so goes the theory.

Posted bywpengine 25 September 2018

 

Posted bywpengine25 September 2018Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
RANDOMLY DRUG TESTING STUDENTS – A school district in Clark County, Indiana, will soon be randomly drug testing students who want to participate in extracurricular activities like sports, band, and driving to school. I suspect it may not achieve the intended result of discouraging “students from bringing drugs to school” as much as discourage “students who want to participate in extracurricular activities.”
Next post Next post:
CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM – Not what any of us were hoping for. We’re all in agreement on that.

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.