Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

LIE DETECTOR TESTS ARE JUNK SCIENCE

Posted bywpengine 19 May 201519 May 2015

Let’s be clear: they are not admissible as evidence in Canadian courts. Here’s one reason: “Cop Faces Up To 100 Years For Training Customers To Lie During Polygraph Exams!”

Source: Courthouse News Service

Posted bywpengine19 May 201519 May 2015Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
WHAT CAN YOU DO IF YOU FIND A DOG IN A HOT CAR?
Next post Next post:
SWATTING – a novel and dangerous crime.

Recent Posts

  • MAPLEHURST CORRECTIONAL CENTRE – IS SO BAD THAT REGIONAL SENIOR JUDGE PAUL CURRIE WAS AFRAID TO BE INCARCERATED THERE. THE COVER-UP IS ARGUABLY WORSE
  • IF YOU WANT TO GET “TOUGH ON CRIME” PERHAPS WE SHOULD START WITH EXPECTING AND REQUIRING THAT THE POLICE ABIDE BY THE LAW
  • The Criminal Lawyers’ Association’s statement on calls for a judicial apology in the Umar Zameer case  
  • The OPP report ‘exonerates’ Toronto cops of perjury in the Umar Zameer murder case. It looks like a whitewash to me. For my money, I’ll follow Justice Anne Malloy.
  • IS ONTARIO’S SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY UNCONSTITUTIONAL?
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.