Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

THE NOTWITHSTANDING CLAUSE IN THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS – is an escape clause that allows a government to override our fundamental rights and freedoms. It is intended as an extreme solution to an extreme situation and the use of it otherwise should come at an extreme cost of political capital. Doug Ford has misused it TWICE already.

Posted byDennis Reeve 15 November 202215 November 2022
https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/news/opinion/doug-ford-finally-paid-the-price-for-his-efforts-to-ignore-the-charter-and-break-democracy/371432
Posted byDennis Reeve15 November 202215 November 2022Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
“Both officers have been suspended with pay since January 2021.” PAID WHILE NOT WORKING BECAUSE OF CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS? Does that seem right to you?
Next post Next post:
YORK REGIONAL POLICE improperly recorded surveillance evidence from 2011 to 2021. This evidence was not disclosed to the defence in any of those cases. If this affects you or your clients you may want to take action. #police #surveillance #criminalcase #disclosure

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.