Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

PRESUMPTIVELY REMOTE COURT HEARINGS – The Supreme Court of Canada’s Chief Justice Richard Wagner said “Now, we actively encourage remote hearings,”

Posted byDennis Reeve 16 June 202216 June 2022
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-chief-justice-richard-wagner-warns-backlogged-legal-system-cant-return/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=Coronavirus%20Update&utm_content=2022-6-16_20&utm_term=Coronavirus%20Update%3A%20Protests%20against%20remaining%20COVID-19%20restrictions%20planned%20in%20Ottawa%20all%20summer&utm_campaign=newsletter&cu_id=QOZRZekEHGFjnSsUBQ0byp8IRf5R4BBL
Posted byDennis Reeve16 June 202216 June 2022Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
THANK YOU Mr. Steven Skurka for being so bold as to raise the “driving while black” defence so many years ago against great outrage. Today, systemic police racism in the Toronto Police Service has finally been officially acknowledged.
Next post Next post:
YES, THEY CAN DO THIS – send the Sheriff out onto the street to randomly grab some potential jurors.

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.