Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

JUST A REMINDER THAT DRINKING AND DRIVING OFFENCES SPEAK IN TERMS OF A “CONVEYANCE” – the definition of which is: “a motor vehicle, a vessel, an aircraft or railway equipment”. This includes any vehicle that is motorized to any degree in any way and a vessel does not have to be motorized.

Posted byDennis Reeve 23 February 202223 February 2022
opp shoulder
https://www.strathroyagedispatch.com/news/local-news/dont-drink-and-drive-also-applies-to-scooters-police
Posted byDennis Reeve23 February 202223 February 2022Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
We’re not going back to pre-covid practices.
Next post Next post:
THE TIME FOR ACCOUNTABILITY – The federal Declaration of Emergency has been revoked. No government gets to exercise such emergency powers without being held accountable for what it did and how it did it. Under section 62 of the Emergencies Act, there will be such a review by a Parliamentary Review Committee. Also, under section 63, the Governor in Council now has 60 days in which to commence an inquiry. THAT is how a democracy works.

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.