Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

THIS IS AN ETHICAL/MORAL QUESTION. SHOULD EXTREME INTOXICATION RETURN AS A DEFENCE TO VIOLENT CRIMES? Our Supreme Court will revisit this issue.

Posted byDennis Reeve 25 January 202225 January 2022
Brain and wind-up illustration
https://www.nationalmagazine.ca/en-ca/articles/law/in-depth/2022/revisiting-the-bedrock-of-moral-fault
Posted byDennis Reeve25 January 202225 January 2022Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
BATTERED WOMAN SYNDROME – Should it be a factor considered? Does it have to be proved? In Alberta, it was considered to be a mitigating factor in sentencing for the killing of her spouse.
Next post Next post:
PREDATORY POLICING FOR PROFIT – Be careful driving through the states.

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.