Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

BATTERED WOMAN SYNDROME – Should it be a factor considered? Does it have to be proved? In Alberta, it was considered to be a mitigating factor in sentencing for the killing of her spouse.

Posted byDennis Reeve 20 January 202220 January 2022
Court ruled that battered woman syndrome is a significant factor in considering joint submissions
https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/practice-areas/criminal/court-ruled-that-battered-woman-syndrome-is-a-significant-factor-in-considering-joint-submissions/363324
Posted byDennis Reeve20 January 202220 January 2022Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
THE POLICE CAN LIE TO YOU. YOU KNEW THAT, RIGHT? – “The “fake certificates of analysis” purporting to be from a state forensic agency were used on at least five occasions, And officials are considering whether it’s fair for the police to lie to adults, too, since other countries have outright banned the practice.”
Next post Next post:
THIS IS AN ETHICAL/MORAL QUESTION. SHOULD EXTREME INTOXICATION RETURN AS A DEFENCE TO VIOLENT CRIMES? Our Supreme Court will revisit this issue.

Recent Posts

  • Credit also has to be given to JAMES LOCKYER for his tireless advocacy over many years to bring this to fruition.
  • Lawyers in England are refusing to represent some people because their legal aid system is insufficient to maintain a viable practice. The legal aid system in Ontario is similarly perpetually on the brink.
  • Since 1982 accused persons have had the right to a trial within a reasonable time. We’ve had the Askov, Morin and now the Jordan cases of the Supreme Court of Canada trying to ensure that right, with only limited success. So now the courts are stacking cases on top of other cases on their daily trial lists that have no possibility of being reached for trial on that date.
  • JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED – Every person charged with a criminal offence has the constitutional right to have their trial held within a reasonable time. Our Supreme Court has twice attempted to define what is reasonable through the cases of Askov and Jordan. The result has been decades of hundreds of cases being “stayed” from proceeding due to delay and further delays caused by the complex application procedures required to assert that right. Nothing has changed. Simply demanding that the trial process proceed expeditiously doesn’t work.
  • WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR BAIL SYSTEM? – The federal government enacts the criminal code. The province applies it. The province builds and owns the courts. The province hires the Judges, the Justices of the Peace, the Crown Attorneys and court staff.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.