Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

An essence of cross-examination.

Posted byDennis Reeve 5 October 20215 October 2021
Posted byDennis Reeve5 October 20215 October 2021Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
ADAPTING TO AND ADOPTING CHANGE – We should have made the change years ago.
Next post Next post:
FORENSIC PATHOLOGY IN ONTARIO – Since the “tunnel vision” bias toward finding abuse horrors of the past, has nothing changed?

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.