Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

CHILD LURING CONVICTIONS – There were many, many wrongful convictions and jail sentences imposed by being presumed guilty under the schemes by police to exploit this unconstitutional presumption.

Posted byDennis Reeve 3 November 20203 November 2020
Court of Appeal sets aside child-luring convictions, orders new trial
https://www.lawtimesnews.com/practice-areas/criminal/court-of-appeal-sets-aside-child-luring-convictions-orders-new-trial/334784?utm_source=GA&utm_medium=20201103&utm_campaign=LTW-Newsletter-20201103&utm_content=60340243-7A36-40AE-831C-5923AFD1310D&tu=60340243-7A36-40AE-831C-5923AFD1310D
Posted byDennis Reeve3 November 20203 November 2020Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
OMG we’re ALL in trouble one way or another! “According to York Regional Police, it’s actually illegal to remove your Band-Aid in a public spot.” And more bad things.
Next post Next post:
OREGON – This is a historic shift. The State has effectively decriminalized possession of all illegal drugs, including heroin, cocaine, and meth.

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.