Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

FAILURE – “the essential prerequisite for success”.

Posted bywpengine 3 November 2019

Scientists use big data to understand what separates winners from losers

Source: Failure Found to be an “Essential Prerequisite” For Success

Posted bywpengine3 November 2019Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
FIVE MEN ACQUITTED OF RAPE BECAUSE THE UNCONSCIOUS TEEN DIDN’T FIGHT BACK. It sounds outrageous to us and is clearly a fault in their definition of consent. In Spain, in order to be the offence of rape, there must be some form of violence or intimidation. In order words, there must be some resistance to indicate lack of consent. In Canada, (where rape has been replaced with sexual assault) it is the opposite in that there has to be a positive expression of consent.
Next post Next post:
WARNING – To those who choose to steal from donation boxes now, at Christmas or at any time be forewarned that if convicted there is a high probability that you will have direct transportation to our local correctional center.

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.