Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

PERSON DRIVES INTO OPP RIDE SPOT CHECK CRUISER – What do you think? Is driving into a RIDE spot-check evidence of impairment? Is the attempt to flee the scene evidence of consciousness of guilt?

Posted bywpengine 9 October 2019

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/crash-delta-ont-impaired-driving-ride-check-1.5310687

Posted bywpengine9 October 2019Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
DRUG IMPAIRMENT – THE FACT IS THAT IT CANNOT BE DETERMINED BY THE ALCOHOL MODEL APPROACH WE ARE TAKING – For cannabis, an officer spends six hours processing an impaired driver, compared to one hour for a driver impaired by alcohol. This difference reflects the time required to complete a specialized field sobriety test, to administer a test by a drug recognition expert and take a blood sample. The minimum cost to have one officer deal with a cannabis-impaired driver is $536.88, compared to $89.48 for an alcohol-impaired driver, suggests the report. Those costs don’t include labour for paperwork or court appearances.
Next post Next post:
9-YEAR-OLD CHARGED WITH 5 COUNTS OF FIRST DEGREE MURDER – This is going to prove to be very controversial!

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.