Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

Can A President Be Impeached On ‘Hearsay’ Evidence? – “There’s a high likelihood that your conservative friends and family members have become lawyers overnight without so much as incurring a single cent of student loan debt, and they’re all too happy to grace you with their expert-level knowledge of constitutional law.”

Posted bywpengine 30 September 201930 September 2019

Please enjoy this lesson on Hearsay 101.

Source: Can A President Be Impeached On ‘Hearsay’ Evidence?

Posted bywpengine30 September 201930 September 2019Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
Canadians banned from U.S.Dos and don’ts at the border. – I found this to be a very informative article.
Next post Next post:
YORK REGIONAL OFF DUTY OFFICER CHARGED WITH IMPAIRED DRIVING AND HIT AND RUN – YRP have a policy of publishing the names of persons charged with impaired driving as I expect they will with this one. The Chief says: “As law enforcement professionals, we are in a position of trust and we are rightfully held to a higher standard by members of our community.” Their video parody “L’Hotel de York Regional Police” doesn’t seem quite so cute now. https://globalnews.ca/video/rd/1412007491764/?jwsource=cl

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.