Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

REVERSE DISCLOSURE IN SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES – More Charter challenges, more appeals, more uncertainty, more delays. We’ll be litigating this one for years.

Posted bywpengine 28 August 2019

Saskatchewan judge Bruce Henning found the reforms force defence lawyers to disclose too much of their evidence to the complainant ahead of time

Source: Citing Ghomeshi, judge deems Liberal reforms in sex assault trials unconstitutional

Posted bywpengine28 August 2019Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
JURY SELECTION – The jury selection process will be again in a state of flux as Parliament, as of September 19th, will require Judges to become involved in the jury selection process without any form of guidance as to how they are to ensure a fair and impartial jury. The result will be more challenges for cause which will slow down and complicate trials and more appeals asserting improper jury selection.
Next post Next post:
NOTE: YOU CANNOT TAKE CANNABIS ACROSS THE BORDER INTO THE UNITED STATES – whether it’s in flower, edible or oil form or whether it’s THC or CBD, it doesn’t matter. You CANNOT take it into the U.S. Period.

Recent Posts

  • Credit also has to be given to JAMES LOCKYER for his tireless advocacy over many years to bring this to fruition.
  • Lawyers in England are refusing to represent some people because their legal aid system is insufficient to maintain a viable practice. The legal aid system in Ontario is similarly perpetually on the brink.
  • Since 1982 accused persons have had the right to a trial within a reasonable time. We’ve had the Askov, Morin and now the Jordan cases of the Supreme Court of Canada trying to ensure that right, with only limited success. So now the courts are stacking cases on top of other cases on their daily trial lists that have no possibility of being reached for trial on that date.
  • JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED – Every person charged with a criminal offence has the constitutional right to have their trial held within a reasonable time. Our Supreme Court has twice attempted to define what is reasonable through the cases of Askov and Jordan. The result has been decades of hundreds of cases being “stayed” from proceeding due to delay and further delays caused by the complex application procedures required to assert that right. Nothing has changed. Simply demanding that the trial process proceed expeditiously doesn’t work.
  • WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR BAIL SYSTEM? – The federal government enacts the criminal code. The province applies it. The province builds and owns the courts. The province hires the Judges, the Justices of the Peace, the Crown Attorneys and court staff.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.