Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

IMPAIRED OPERATION OF A CANOE = IMPAIRED OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE

Posted bywpengine 29 June 2019

It is easy to laugh at the idea of drinking and canoeing. But the Sillars case shows how devastating the consequences of a boating accident can be

Source: In a case that made Canadian legal history, Ontario man convicted of impaired operation of a canoe

Posted bywpengine29 June 2019Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
GIVE THEM POWER AND THEY WILL ABUSE IT + SPEEDING UP THE COURT SYSTEM – If the government really wanted to speed up the trial process they might start with not passing blatantly unconstitutional criminal laws that clog up the court process with hundreds and thousands of challenge applications which take years to resolve.
Next post Next post:
“Act of dragging complainant while asleep and drugged was inconsistent with any sort of consent.” – You wouldn’t have thought this would have to go to the Supreme Court of Canada to be decided.

Recent Posts

  • Credit also has to be given to JAMES LOCKYER for his tireless advocacy over many years to bring this to fruition.
  • Lawyers in England are refusing to represent some people because their legal aid system is insufficient to maintain a viable practice. The legal aid system in Ontario is similarly perpetually on the brink.
  • Since 1982 accused persons have had the right to a trial within a reasonable time. We’ve had the Askov, Morin and now the Jordan cases of the Supreme Court of Canada trying to ensure that right, with only limited success. So now the courts are stacking cases on top of other cases on their daily trial lists that have no possibility of being reached for trial on that date.
  • JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED – Every person charged with a criminal offence has the constitutional right to have their trial held within a reasonable time. Our Supreme Court has twice attempted to define what is reasonable through the cases of Askov and Jordan. The result has been decades of hundreds of cases being “stayed” from proceeding due to delay and further delays caused by the complex application procedures required to assert that right. Nothing has changed. Simply demanding that the trial process proceed expeditiously doesn’t work.
  • WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR BAIL SYSTEM? – The federal government enacts the criminal code. The province applies it. The province builds and owns the courts. The province hires the Judges, the Justices of the Peace, the Crown Attorneys and court staff.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.