Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

BAD CRIMINAL LAWS – You cannot measure impairment by the level of THC or its metabolites in a body. Period. There is no scientific evidence to support our arbitrary criminal THC driving limit.

Posted bywpengine 31 May 2019

The researchers found no statistically significant relationship between testing positive for THC and contributing to accidents.

Source: New Car Crash Study Highlights the Irrationality of DUI Laws Based on THC in Drivers’ Blood

Posted bywpengine31 May 2019Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
REVENGE PORN – Penalties are increasing as “judges are seeing this harm as extremely impactful”. Think twice first. It’s considered more serious than you think it is.
Next post Next post:
BAD CRIMINAL LAWS – A 16-year-old girl, “S.K.,” was convicted of child pornography charges for taking a video of herself performing a sex act and sending it to a few of her close friends. Unintended consequences. Unexpected issues. “A finding of guilt would be an attack on the autonomy and self-ownership of all young people.”

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.