Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

IMPAIRED GRASS CUTTING? – “RCMP reminded the public that it is illegal to operate any motorized vehicle while impaired, including tractors.” And E-bikes.

Posted bywpengine 8 May 2019

Source: Man arrested under suspicion of driving a lawn mower while impaired | CBC News

Posted bywpengine8 May 2019Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
WE DON’T NEED NO MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCES – We expected the last Attorney General to put an end to this. “Regardless of the seriousness — or emotional punch — of a crime, minimum sentencing does not do what it’s supposed to do, namely justly punishing those who have committed a crime. Removing minimum sentences ultimately benefits not only the unjustly accused, but everyone, by working toward a more fair, nuanced legal system.”
Next post Next post:
IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF A CANADIAN CRIMINAL OFFENCE – True. There can be severe immigration consequences of involvement in the criminal justice system for a lot of you. Criminal defence lawyers are not experts in immigration law, so as a PSA I provide this link for your information.

Recent Posts

  • Credit also has to be given to JAMES LOCKYER for his tireless advocacy over many years to bring this to fruition.
  • Lawyers in England are refusing to represent some people because their legal aid system is insufficient to maintain a viable practice. The legal aid system in Ontario is similarly perpetually on the brink.
  • Since 1982 accused persons have had the right to a trial within a reasonable time. We’ve had the Askov, Morin and now the Jordan cases of the Supreme Court of Canada trying to ensure that right, with only limited success. So now the courts are stacking cases on top of other cases on their daily trial lists that have no possibility of being reached for trial on that date.
  • JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED – Every person charged with a criminal offence has the constitutional right to have their trial held within a reasonable time. Our Supreme Court has twice attempted to define what is reasonable through the cases of Askov and Jordan. The result has been decades of hundreds of cases being “stayed” from proceeding due to delay and further delays caused by the complex application procedures required to assert that right. Nothing has changed. Simply demanding that the trial process proceed expeditiously doesn’t work.
  • WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR BAIL SYSTEM? – The federal government enacts the criminal code. The province applies it. The province builds and owns the courts. The province hires the Judges, the Justices of the Peace, the Crown Attorneys and court staff.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.