Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

POLICE RECORD CHECKS – If you’re wondering if that old indiscretion will be reported on a “criminal record check”, here is a summary of what can and cannot be disclosed in each level of record checks.

Posted bywpengine 18 April 2019

Source: Police record checks | Ministry of the Solicitor General

Posted bywpengine18 April 2019Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
ARE ELECTRONIC SEXUAL CONVERSATIONS PRIVATE? – Not if it’s with a child (or someone pretending to be a child) that you don’t know. In such a case you have no reasonable expectation of privacy, our Supreme Court says. (R. v. Mills) I wonder if that’s going to apply to all electronic communications involved in any alleged crime? Here is the “Case in Brief”.
Next post Next post:
After deciding that the determination of whether a ‘reasonable expectation of privacy” exists in communications is contextual, have now found that the nature of the relationship is context. Specifically (?) you do not have an expectation of privacy in a sexual communication with someone you believe to be a child, who is a stranger to you.

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.