Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

TO TEXT OR NOT TO TEXT? – I prefer to email with clients, for the reasons explained here.

Posted bywpengine 12 February 2019

Take the pros and cons of text messaging seriously when it comes to your law practice.

Source: To Text, Or Not To Text, Clients: An Ethical Question For A Technological Time

Posted bywpengine12 February 2019Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
JUSTICE or VENGEANCE – What motivates our sentencing decisions?
Next post Next post:
POLICE INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES – After viewing many interrogations over the years, this pretty well sets out the steps of the REID method of questioning suspects. This is why we ALWAYS tell clients to say NOTHING.

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.