Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

NEW DRIVING LAWS – If you drive home, park, go inside and have a couple of drinks in the next two hours that puts you over the legal driving limit, you will be committing a criminal offence of impaired driving. Make sense?

Posted bywpengine 11 January 2019

Canada’s new impaired-driving law allows police to give breath tests to any drivers they want, even if they have no reason to suspect drunkenness.

Source: How the rules for breath tests in Canada have changed

Posted bywpengine11 January 2019Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
RETURN THE PARDONS – Harper changed a pardon to a “record suspension”, increased the rehabilitation period, increased the fees and ensured there was always a long backlog. Liberals promised to rectify that. They haven’t.
Next post Next post:
THE AGE OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY – This is something we don’t often think about. It’s a cultural value judgment. No child here can be held criminally responsible for their actions until they reach the age of 12 years. In Manila, they’re lowering their age from 15 to 9. Different culture.

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.