Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

YORK REGIONAL POLICE TO POST NAMES OF THOSE CHARGED WITH IMPAIRED-RELATED CRIMINAL DRIVING OFFENCES – What do you think of this?

Posted bywpengine 3 December 2018

YORK REGIONAL POLICE TO POST NAMES OF THOSE CHARGED WITH IMPAIRED-RELATED CRIMINAL DRIVING OFFENCES AFTER 27 CHARGES LAID THIS WEEKEND

Source: YORK REGIONAL POLICE TO POST NAMES OF THOSE CHARGED WITH IMPAIRED-RELATED CRIMINAL DRIVING OFFENCES AFTER 27 CHARGES LAID THIS WEEKEND

Posted bywpengine3 December 2018Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
IMPAIRED DRIVING AND IMMIGRATION – In adapting to the legalization of marijuana, Parliament has increased the maximum sentence of driving impaired by alcohol or a drug from 5 years to 10 years, making it an offence of “serious criminality”. To anyone who is a permanent or temporary resident, a conviction means deportation and no right of appeal.
Next post Next post:
NO CANNABIS SUPPLY = NO STORES – This is what happens when the government controls the market: Ontario government changes rules for pot shops, only 25 stores to open April 1

Recent Posts

  • Credit also has to be given to JAMES LOCKYER for his tireless advocacy over many years to bring this to fruition.
  • Lawyers in England are refusing to represent some people because their legal aid system is insufficient to maintain a viable practice. The legal aid system in Ontario is similarly perpetually on the brink.
  • Since 1982 accused persons have had the right to a trial within a reasonable time. We’ve had the Askov, Morin and now the Jordan cases of the Supreme Court of Canada trying to ensure that right, with only limited success. So now the courts are stacking cases on top of other cases on their daily trial lists that have no possibility of being reached for trial on that date.
  • JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED – Every person charged with a criminal offence has the constitutional right to have their trial held within a reasonable time. Our Supreme Court has twice attempted to define what is reasonable through the cases of Askov and Jordan. The result has been decades of hundreds of cases being “stayed” from proceeding due to delay and further delays caused by the complex application procedures required to assert that right. Nothing has changed. Simply demanding that the trial process proceed expeditiously doesn’t work.
  • WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR BAIL SYSTEM? – The federal government enacts the criminal code. The province applies it. The province builds and owns the courts. The province hires the Judges, the Justices of the Peace, the Crown Attorneys and court staff.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.