Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

GOOGLE-HAPPY JURORS ARE A NO NO.

Posted bywpengine 23 May 2018

Jurors in three recent cases were discovered conducting their own online research, despite strict instructions from judges to consider only the evidence raised in court.

Source: How Google-happy jurors are derailing Ontario trials | The Star

Posted bywpengine23 May 2018Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
UNINTENDED IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF INCREASING THE MAXIMUM SENTENCE FOR IMPAIRED DRIVING TO 10 YEARS.
Next post Next post:
Fentanyl production, worldwide distribution, money laundering, global real estate investment by Chinese gangs explained in a 1:45 min. video.

Recent Posts

  • CASH BAIL PROPOSALS AND BAIL REFORM ARE AT BEST PERFORMATIVE POLITICS AND A WORST A DISASTER. The position of the Criminal Lawyers’ Association follow.
  • In criminal law, the identity of a confidential informant is protected. But this case is also about unacceptable delay which results in charges being stayed. In my experience, a common cause of delay is caused by the police and the Crown not disclosing all of the evidence in a timely manner, which is not uncommon. As reported by The Star:
  • COULD I BE MORE PROUD OF MY SON? Not really.
  • WHAT IS AN “INTIMATE IMAGE” IN THE DAYS OF PHOTO MANIPULATION AND AI?
  • The Criminal Lawyers’ Association’s response to political calls to be “Tough on Crime” by our President, Boris Bytensky.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.