Skip to content

The ReeveLaw Blog

Criminal Defence Law Blog

JUNK SCIENCE: WE HAVE TO STOP JUST BELIEVING SO-CALLED “FORENSIC EXPERTS” –

Posted bywpengine 23 April 2015

Pseudoscience in the Witness Box

The FBI faked an entire field of forensic science.

“The Washington Post published a story so horrifying this weekend that it would stop your breath. The FBI’s three-decade use of microscopic hair analysis to incriminate defendants was a complete disaster. The Post reported that flawed forensic hair matches might have led to possibly hundreds of wrongful convictions for rape, murder, and other violent crimes, dating back at least to the 1970s.”Source: FBI’s flawed forensics expert testimony: Hair analysis, bite marks, fingerprints, arson.

Posted bywpengine23 April 2015Posted inUncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post Previous post:
ARE OUR COURTS SOFT ON CRIME?
Next post Next post:
The Impact Of Smoking Marijuana Regularly On Your Lungs, According To Science | ThinkProgress

Recent Posts

  • “POLITICIANS CAN NEVER RESIST THE URGE TO TURN A MESSY LEGAL CASE INTO A CHEAP POLITICAL PROP” This refers specifically to DOUG FORD and PIERRE POILIEVRE. But then, the lack of knowledge of the facts never restrains their political proclamations. Michael Spratt explains:
  • THE DIRTY TRICK OF SPEED CAMERAS – It’s about making common conduct an offence for money. Their real purpose is to raise revenue and not to increase safety. The fact is that posted speed limits are not calibrated to the speed of the flow of traffic and are not intended to be strictly enforced. Travelling at or below the speed limit is usually, in practical terms, dangerous. (Try it some time.) Speed camera thresholds do not accommodate reality.
  • The Freedom Convoy’s favourite lawyer has been disbarred.
  • THIS APPLIES EQUALLY TO DANIELLE SMITH AND PIERRE POILIEVRE AS IT DOES TO DOUG FORD
  • You may be able to get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich but they won’t indict a salami sub.
The ReeveLaw Blog, Proudly powered by WordPress.