Justice is the key to peace and the process must APPEAR to be just. Officer Wilson may well be not guilty but the problem is that this was not the question. The question was whether there should be a trial. The grand jury’s function, like our preliminary inquiry, is to receive evidence and assuming it to be true, decide whether it is sufficient that an impartial, properly instructed jury COULD (possibly) find guilt. If so, then there is a proper trial conducted by a judge which is open and transparent to the public. This grand jury assessed evidence, determined credibility of witnesses and made findings of fact in a proceeding considering inadmissible evidence, without cross-examination, without a judge or proper legal instruction, directed by a prosecutor behind closed doors in secret. The jury did not decide if there should be a trial, they effectively were the trial and rendered a VERDICT of not guilty. That leaves open the very reasonable suspicion that a police friendly prosecutor manipulated the process in favour of the police. Confidence in justice cannot be achieved by a flawed process conducted in secret.