After many years we’re still fighting the Crown’s extremely prejudicial attempts to introduce junk science into evidence to obtain convictions of sexual assault. In this case the Crown used a purported expert “child psychologist to testify about the effect of delayed, incremental and inconsistent disclosure by child victims of trauma including child abuse and a correlation between child sexual abuse and non-epileptic seizures and post traumatic stress disorder.” Fortunately our Court of Appeal can’t be as easily tricked by this nonsense as the convicting trial Judge was.