WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR BAIL SYSTEM? – The federal government enacts the criminal code. The province applies it. The province builds and owns the courts. The province hires the Judges, the Justices of the Peace, the Crown Attorneys and court staff.

“The administration of bail is a provincial responsibility,” the Minister’s office said in a statement provided to CityNews.

“Ontario must step up and ensure their courts and prosecutors are well resourced, that provincially appointed Justices of the Peace are applying the law — and when they don’t — provincially appointed crowns need to initiate bail reviews.

“Doug Ford also needs to ensure that there are enough spaces in provincial detention facilities to house people in custody awaiting trial. It’s time to stop deflecting and start enforcing the laws we’ve already passed in collaboration with them.”https://toronto.citynews.ca/2024/10/03/feds-fire-back-at-ford-over-bail-barbs-saying-its-a-provincial-responsibility/

YET ANOTHER ILL ADVISED CROWN PROSECUTION OF AN INNOCENT MAN (The Star May 28, 2024)

AFTER TWO YEAR IN JAIL, A JURY TOOK JUST TWO HOURS TO FIND HIM NOT GUILTY.

Timothy Clarke Anthony spent two years in jail awaiting trial for a fatal hit-and-run that shocked the Hagersville community. Once his day in court arrived, it took a jury just two hours to find him not guilty, Jacques Gallant reports. “I wasn’t sure what they were going to think,” the 37-year-old said. “I’m an Indigenous man in a white court.” In the 2021 incident, the motorcycle driven by 21-year-old Alexander Dalton was hit from behind by a speeding Chevrolet Tahoe, throwing him from his vehicle and into the path of oncoming traffic. Anthony was arrested for his alleged involvement, despite evidence to the contrary, after another suspect in the case claimed he was behind the wheel. Take a closer look at what happened.
• Context: The defence noted witness descriptions of the driver didn’t match Anthony’s profile and his DNA wasn’t present in the vehicle. The evidence against Anthony was “essentially reliant on a witness who had all the reason in the world to lie,” his lawyer, Tonya Kent, said.
• The fallout: Kent said Anthony’s case was another example of a prosecution that should never have happened. But despite the weak evidence against him, he was repeatedly denied bail and kept in jail until last month.

What strikes me about this article is the prior belief that crimes were committed only by the poor and working class people. It makes me wonder how much the past ideas of eugenics still instruct our beliefs about our criminal justice system. “the case became a sensation because of the killers’ wealth and social status, which ran counter to the then-popular theory that crime was confined to the lower classes. “The murderers went against the grain of popular belief in criminology,” he said. “The idea was that only the poor and working-class people committed crimes, which was the basis behind eugenics.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2024/05/20/leopold-loeb-murder-bobby-franks/?utm_campaign=wp_must_reads&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_mustreads

Do you still believe that police officers always tell the truth on the witness stand? Justice Fergus O’Donnell knows better. – “In a ruling comparing a group of police officers to the golden-era TV buffoon Sgt. Schultz — the “Hogan’s Heroes” prison guard with the catchphrase, “I see nothing! I hear nothing! I know nothing!” — an Ontario Court judge has made a remarkably direct call for honesty from officers acting as witnesses in criminal trials. “TELL THE TRUTH,” Justice Fergus O’Donnell wrote.”

https://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/news/ontario/tell-the-truth-exasperated-ontario-judge-compares-police-officers-to-classic-sitcom-buffoon/article_46aaaa77-0b67-51f0-848b-5f33cb001ca5.html

ANOTHER TRAGIC DECISION OF THE TORONTO CROWN ATTORNEYS’ OFFICE TO PROSECUTE A CASE – In the aftermath of the acquittal of Mr. Zameer, another tragic decision, this time to prosecute Lindsay Hewson is revealed.

“The Crown’s decision to prosecute was so questionable that a judge took the rare step of suggesting it was not in the public interest to proceed to trial. But the Crown went ahead anyway, forcing a grieving Hewson, her partner, and the court system into a process that dragged over three years only to end in January with most of the charges gone and Hewson with no criminal record, and no jail time.

Hewson’s lawyers are left asking: What was the point?

The case was an example of “the criminalization of poverty,” said one of Hewson’s lawyers, Megan Savard. “If a wealthy white woman had left a dishwasher pod on the floor and her child had consumed it and died, and had she responded exactly as urgently and responsibly as our client responded, I think it is fair to say she would never have been charged.”

The Crown has complete discretion over which charges laid by police should proceed in court — if any — and is required by policy to only go ahead “if there is a reasonable prospect of conviction and it is in the public interest.”

But in a rare move, Bliss (who conducted the preliminary inquiry) concluded his ruling by questioning the necessity of putting the parents on trial.

“I wish to stress, however, that the fact that there is some evidence that requires the defendants to be committed for trial does not mean that the defendants would, or even should, be convicted, nor should their committal for trial be taken, in the circumstances of this case, to be an endorsement of the view that it is in the public interest to prosecute them for the death of their son,” the judge wrote.”

https://www.thespec.com/news/ontario/her-baby-s-death-was-a-tragedy-did-it-have-to-be-a-crime/article_55c9fefe-6d6b-5b8f-84f7-463881cc1112.html